$129,757 raised of $400,000 goal

Thank you!

£21  •  Anonymous
Langford, BEDS., United Kingdom
CA$51  •  Anonymous
Kanata, ON, Canada
$101  •  Pavitter Kaur
Surrey, BC, Canada
$501  •  Anonymous
Fullerton, CA, United States
$101  •  Anonymous
Tucson, AZ, United States
£100  •  Anonymous
Birmingham, W MIDLANDS, United Kingdom
£5  •  Anonymous
Earley, BERKS., United Kingdom
£51  •  Anonymous
London, MIDDX., United Kingdom
$200  •  Anonymous
Singapore, Singapore
A$2,000  •  Inderjit Singh
Hillarys, WA, Australia
A$51  •  Gurvinder Singh
Sydney, NSW, Australia
£51  •  Anonymous
Uxbridge, MIDDX., United Kingdom
$101  •  Jagjit Chawla
Cherry Hill, NJ, United States
£20  •  Mandeep Sidhu
Wembley, LONDON, United Kingdom
$1,001  •  Anonymous
Westlake Village, CA, United States
$51  •  Janjeet Grewal
East Elmhurst, NY, United States
£12  •  Anonymous
Warwickshire, WARKS, United Kingdom
CA$101  •  Sukhminder Dhami
Mississauga, ON, Canada
$21  •  Manohar Arora
Indianapolis, IN, United States
€8  •  Anonymous
Madrid, Spain
Icons made by Freepik from www.flaticon.com

Sikh Ethnic (ਕੌਮੀ) Tick-Box Court Case in the UK

Some thoughts as we wait for the judgement in the case...

Sikh Ethnic (ਕੌਮੀ) Tick-Box Court Case in the UK

  • The Queen on the application of Gill v Cabinet Office.
  • In December 2019, on the basis of the evidence presented, UK High Court ruled that Sikh application was premature. Sikhs are now told by the Cabinet Office that they are too late!
  • Despite centuries of Anglo-Sikh relations, are British Sikhs victims of institutional racism over the last few decades in the UK?

Good Sikhs are also loyal citizens of the countries they live in. However, they will always challenge injustice and institutional racism wherever they live. That is their Sikhi duty and democratic right

“If the census order approved by the UK Parliament is “quashed” and redesigned with a Sikh  ethnic tick-box, it will delay the entire census being carried out by a full year and cost a quarter of a billion pounds…. the Cabinet Office has told the high court here.” (Times of India, 24 October 2020)

Some cost analysts are completely bewildered! How did senior officials at the Office for National Statistics (ONS) arrive at that figure of “a quarter of a billion pounds” and presented it in evidence under oath?

According to one source, “The 2020-21 published estimates for the UK Statistics Authority indicate the spend on staff costs up to 31 March 2021 will only be £36 million higher.  After taking account of pay rises and non-census related costs, for example, additional work associated with COVID-19, it is reasonable to assume the total cost of employing additional staff for the census that is currently underway would be no more than £30 million up to 31 March 2021.” 

So, let us say total additional cost of under £50 million. That is a long way off from a quarter of a billion pounds stated by ONS!

This evidence under oath is against UK Sikhs being granted their legal right  established in the House of Lords Mandla case in 1983 to be accepted as an ethnic community against clearly defined criteria. The Cabinet Office does not question this because that is an established legal fact. Only a few misguided Sikhs question this classification of Sikhs, otherwise in according to their historical right as a “nation” at par with other categories in the Census like Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi etc.

Over the last few years, the same ONS officials have been going through the motions of consulting the Sikhs about the need for an ethnic tick box  for improving statistics to inform government policy and allocation of resources. Should Sikhs be punished for alleged bias by the ONS officials if it is shown by evidence before the court that for reasons known only to themselves - although, UK Sikhs have a fair idea! - they have failed to follow due process in the case of the Sikhs?

They have misled the Sikhs. On the evidence presented, the UK High Court ruled that Sikh application was premature in December 2019. In May 2020 the Sikh Federation’s solicitors asked the Office for National Statistics (ONS) to confirm that no irreversible steps were being taken to progress the 2021 Census prior to the conclusion of the judicial review proceedings.   The ONS ignored this and pushed ahead with preparations for the Census in March 2021. That evidence is before the court.

In the UK, once again, British Sikhs are making history. For the second time within an year, they are taking their case to the law courts to be recognised, counted and monitored as a distinct community. The key to such recognition is the ethnicity tick box in the Census. The same ethnic categories of communities classified as Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi etc are also used by thousands of public bodies to assess community needs. Not RELIGION, as is being misleadingly suggested by some.

Sikhs regard it as their democratic right to challenge injustice and institutional racism wherever they live.

The case is a glaring example of prolonged institutional racism against one of the most loyal and hard-working UK communities, least dependent on the state and making a massive net positive contribution to the UK economy. Senior politicians of all parties never tire of repeating that from Gurdwaras stages. Yet, the expensive choice of quashing the census order approved by the UK Parliament and related costs has been put to the court now in evidence against allowing the Sikhs their just and legal right to own “ethnic” tick-box so that they are no longer lost in statistics! The simple fact is that if you are not counted you do not count!

The Sikhs have argued that the delay in filing the second application is entirely due to the biased and careless process followed by ONS vis a vis the British Sikhs.

Sometimes it is possible to look at linked current topics through the same lens. On the forums, there is a heated debate about the role played at critical times in history by prominent Sikhs in key positions. UK is no exception as the background to this case suggests.  Did some Sikhs become tools of the state and the administration to promote themselves or did they stand up for Sikhi principles and did what was right for own community, the country and the people?

In the UK we do wonder who are the true “Friends of India”. There is a mistaken belief sometimes that to look after the lawful interests of own community one has to make a choice between community and country. Yet, it does not take much reflection to see that what is in the best interests of own community cannot be bad for other sister communities and the country.

If a conflict is seen by those in pivotal roles, then either the concept of what is in the best interest of own community is misplaced, or the conflict is not with the country and its people but with some form of bad government. Those who let down own community at critical junctures in history will be judged harshly by history.

Some thoughts as we wait for the judgement in the case of The Queen on the application of Gill v Cabinet Office.

Gurmukh Singh OBE
Ret’d Senior Civil Servant UK
E-mail: [email protected]

Add a Comment