Editor's Note:
Any story on Manmohan Singh in these pages attracts the full gamut of emotions and comments.
Being unequivocally a man of impeccable honesty, integrity and competence - in a nation totally mired in corruption, general and steady decline of its masses, and extreme incomptence at all levels, including its 'leaders' - he receives well-deserved bouquets.
As a prime minister who sees his role as defined by, and representing, only the best interests of India - and not willing to get involved in Sikh issues, even though he is a Sikh himself - he is prone to, either unwittingly or through political compulsion, regurgitating the lies, half-truths and obfuscations formulated by the right-wing, extremist and narrow-minded Hindu interests that have a strangle-hold on his government and nation.
We at sikhchic.com present to you this excellent interview by a world-renowned and respected journalist for a number of reasons, including:
To begin, he, Manmohan Singh is for better or worse one of us! As a Sikh - and like evey Sikh - he is an ambassador of our community, wherever he goes, whatever he does. In many ways, he has done us proud as a man who stands head and shoulders over his peers around the world.
Also, knowing that he is a mouthpiece of a certain anti-Sikh mind-set in India, we need to know exactly what lies are being concocted against us and how and where they are being disseminated. We need to understand all aspects of this difficult situation in order to figure out a solution to the problem.
Turning a blind eye to these realities will not get us anywhere. Not giving these realities any coverage on this, the prime Sikh forum of this kind in the world - as some of our readers would want us to do - will get us nowhere.
In the spirit of providing you a glimpse of what we are up against, we present to you this interview ... with the following anecdote that is often quoted in Washington, D.C. circles and, coincidentally, also encapsules our own predicament as a community. In this story lies a valuable lesson for us, especially vis-a-vis our dealings with Manmohan Singh and others like him.
The story goes that President Franklin D. Roosevelt was approached by a friend and supporter - a black labour leader representing a powerrful nation-wide union of railway porters - for help. During a meeting with the President, the labour leader put up a strong case for the passing of new legislation to correct historical wrongs. As Roosevelt said goodbye to his friend at the door following the latter's presentation, he said: "OK, you've convinced me. Now go out and put pressure on me ... so that I can help you put this thing through."
Sadly, we - the Sikh community - have yet to learn how to put pressure on politicians, even those who are on our side or are one of us, so as to provide them the Archimedean leverage and tools to bring about the necessary change.
We humbly suggest that we need to ponder on the following question: are Dr. Manmohan Singh's failures vis-a-vis our issues actually our own failures - that is, of the community itself?
It'll be most helpful if comments from readers will focus on this area rather than once again decrying and lamenting Manmohan Singh's failures.
AN INTERVIEW BY HAROON SIDDIQUI
The fragile world economy needs more stimulus spending, not cutbacks, India's Prime Minister Manmohan Singh told the Toronto Star in an exclusive interview.
Wading into the hottest topic of the G20 summit, he sided with Barack Obama against German Chancellor Angela Merkel and Britain's David Cameron, who have both launched cutbacks and austerity programs to control mounting deficits and debts.
Without naming names, Manmohan Singh made it clear where he stands: "My own feeling is that early fiscal retrenchment carries very considerable global risks" of jeopardizing worldwide economic recovery.
"The purpose of G20 should be to ensure that the momentum of recovery is sustained and enhanced in the years to come," he told me.
Manmohan Singh is the only professional economist among the 20 leaders at the summit.
He is the leader of the world's biggest democracy and second largest nation with 1.3 billion people and a $1 trillion economy, about the same as Canada's but growing at about three times the rate and projected to become the world's third largest economy.
I met Dr. Singh, 77, at his residence in this grand and legendary capital of magnificent monuments and red stone buildings from the British Raj, the Mughal Empire and an ancient civilization - a sublime fusion of the East and the West.
He covered a range of topics, besides the G20 - Afghanistan, Pakistan, India's economic and geopolitical clout and its relations with Canada.
He responded readily and directly, in person and in writing, to the many questions I posed him:
He complained of "Sikh extremism" in Canada, and charged that Canadian Sikh extremists "have links to or are themselves wedded to terrorism." He said he would be raising the issue with Harper on Sunday, June 27, 2010.
He suggested that Canada and other NATO members should not abandon Afghanistan next year. Doing so would "only embolden the radical forces opposed to the emergence of a peaceful, pluralistic and democratic Afghanistan."
He praised Canada's "well-governed economy," its "exemplary" banking system and strong financial regulatory regime. That allowed Canada to escape the financial crisis relatively unscathed, just like India. Both can now contribute to the world economic recovery.
Manmohan Singh speaks softly and succinctly. Unlike most politicians who yap and yearn for attention, he's economical with his words and focused in his replies. Modest, he dislikes the limelight.
He did not even seek political office, but was recruited to it.
A Ph.D. from Cambridge, a former professor of economics who served as the secretary-general of the South Commission in Geneva and then as the governor of the Reserve Bank of India, he was named finance minister in 1991 (and concurrently a member of the upper house of parliament).
The free market reforms he introduced are widely credited for unleashing India's economic miracle.
Despite his age and heart surgery, he says "there's no question of my retirement."
He is a Gandhian figure, who, like the great Mahatma, is very much of this world but seemingly unsullied by it.
In a land rife with corruption, Manmohan Singh's honesty is legendary. For decades, he drove himself to work in his beat-up car from his modest house.
Upon becoming prime minister in 2004, he was moved for security reasons to a grand 1930s whitewashed bungalow with high ceilings and wooden floors, sprawling lawns, mature trees, and compound walls.
Known for his punctuality and courtesy, Dr. Singh saw me there, on the dot at the appointed hour, greeting me standing, his folded hands raised in the Indian namaste.
G20 economic woesMaking the case for continued stimulus spending, Manmohan Singh said:
"I think the purpose of G20 should be to reach a broad-based agreement about coordinating macro-economic policy in a manner in which the momentum of recovery can be sustained and enhanced in the years to come, at the same time not giving scope to an inflationary bout which nobody wants.
"But right now, the danger of deflation in the global economy is, in my view, much greater than the danger of inflation."
Asked if he is optimistic or pessimistic, given the Greek bailout and the impending crises in Portugal and Spain, he said:
"Quite honestly, I think the world economy is faced with a number of uncertainties. As it was gradually getting out of the deep depression or deep recession, we've had the Euro-zone crisis and the sovereign debt crisis."
How Europe manages its affairs is "going to be a major determinant of which way the world economy evolves."
Both Canada and India escaped the worst of the economic meltdown because they had strong financial regulatory frameworks. Both oppose the proposed bank levy to pay for future bailouts. Manmohan Singh feels both are well-positioned for the future.
"Canada is a well-governed economy. The Canadian banking system's performance has been exemplary. It has been free of the aberrations of the Anglo-Saxon banking system.
"We (in India) also escaped that sort of calamity. Our banking system was well regulated, remains well regulated. We do not fear for our banking system being vulnerable to that type of crisis.
"Now there's a fear that the Euro-zone and European Union banking system may also be somewhat more vulnerable than envisaged earlier."
While the financial crisis has been caused by the West, sans Canada, countries like India do get affected, he said.
"Therefore, the real challenge before the world is the equitable management of the increased global interdependence of nations. And I think that is the principal task of the G20."
India's economy was galloping at nearly 9 per cent a year, then dipped to 6.7 per cent in 2008-09 but has rebounded since to 8.5 per cent this year and is projected to reach 9 per cent in the years ahead.
"Let me say that India can play its role in the world economy by sustaining the growth momentum . . .
"But we are vulnerable. If the world economy goes into the wrong sort of gear, I think that will create problems for us. Capital flows can be affected. If so, they create their own consequences.
"So, we have a vested interest in an orderly evolution of the global economy.
"We would like the rich countries to sustain a recovery and avoid premature ups and downs of the type which have been experienced since 2008."
Canada-India links
Manmohan Singh and Harper are slated to sign four agreements Sunday - nuclear cooperation, mining, higher education and culture. They are aiming to increase bilateral trade from $5 billion a year to $15 billion. As with China, Harper had a slow start with India but has warmed up to the task (which offers him the partisan side-benefit of wooing Indo-Canadians towards the Conservatives, something he will do Sunday at a gala dinner for Manmohan Singh and the community).
Canada has been slow to catch up on the civilian nuclear bonanza in India. Following the U.S. decision in 2008 to enhance civilian nuclear cooperation with India, New Delhi has done deals with American, French and Russian companies to build nuclear reactors in India.
Canada hopes to sell uranium as well as nuclear technology. There's also talk of Canada and India cooperating in nuclear energy business ventures in Africa and other parts of the world.
Manmohan Singh said: "We regard Canada as an important partner in this endeavour. India has an ambitious program of development of nuclear energy and I see vast opportunities for Indo-Canadian cooperation.
"Given our mutual strengths, we could certainly look at cooperating in other areas of the world."
[Courtesy: The Toronto Star. Haroon Siddiqui is the Star's editorial page editor emeritus.]