Sikhs Challenge U.S. Army's Ban on Turbans, Beards

June 15th, 2009 by Associated Press

 

NEW YORK  —  Military service is in Capt. Kamaljit Singh Kalsi's blood.

His father and grandfather were part of India's Air Force. His great-grandfather served in the army in India under the British. So when U.S. Army recruiters talked to him during his first year of medical school, he readily signed up.

But his plans to go on active duty in July are now on hold. An Army policy from the 1980s that regulates the wearing of religious items would mean he would need to shave his beard and remove the turban he wears in accordance with his religious precepts.

Kalsi and another Sikh man with the same concerns, Second Lt. Tejdeep Singh Rattan, are the centerpieces of an advocacy campaign launched by the Sikh Coalition as it tries to persuade the Army to let them serve without sacrificing their articles of faith.

"I'm an American, there's no reason why I can't serve," Kalsi, 32, said.

The Army has a long-standing interest in how its members carry themselves, with policies that ban exotic hair colors, long fingernails or certain colors of lipstick. Army officials declined to comment on the reasoning behind its policy that would force the Sikh men to give up their religious displays. Sikhs who were active-duty military when the policy was adopted were allowed to continue serving without shaving their beards or removing their turbans.

The Pentagon and other military institutions wouldn't comment. The Military Religious Freedom Foundation, an advocacy group, was unfamiliar with the policy's origins.

As the Sikh diaspora has spread across the world, the issue of turbans and beards on Sikhs in uniform has come up in a number of places. In New York City, for example, Sikh traffic officers took successful legal action to force the city to allow them to wear turbans and beards.

The Sikh community is hopeful it will win the policy appeal; in an April 29 letter to the Sikh Coalition, the director of the Army's Human Resources Policy Directorate said senior leadership was aware of the issue and was gathering information to make a decision. Toni Delancey, a spokeswoman for Army personnel, said the appeals are under review.

Sikh Coalition executive director Amardeep Singh said he hopes that not only are Kalsi and Rattan allowed to serve, but that the rule will be changed for all turbaned and bearded Sikhs who would want to enlist.

"Our country's military needs to reflect what America is right now," he said. "It's a diverse country, it's a country that puts forth for the rest of the world the values of liberty, particularly religious liberty."

Allowing Sikhs to serve with beard and turban "will send a very strong message to the rest of the world that we are who we say we are."

The Sikh faith requires adherents to follow certain rules, among them that hair is not to be cut and for men, the wearing of a turban. Both Kalsi, an emergency room doctor, and Rattan, a dental surgeon, say they were following those rules when they were recruited and never had any problems or were told they wouldn't be able to serve with their beards or turbans.

Both said they raised the issue over the years and were reassured, and that it wasn't until the end of last year when they were told they would not be allowed to serve as they were.

The idea that he would have to choose between his country and his faith is hard for Rattan. "I'm offering my life, but I'm not willing to sacrifice my religious beliefs," he said.

Singh said it would be in the military's best interest to lets Sikhs serve. The community has a long tradition of military service, both in India, where most of the faith's adherents are, as well as in the countries where Sikhs have made their homes, like Canada and the United Kingdom.

"As part of our religious heritage, we're taught that we have an obligation to actively serve and protect the communities in which we live," he said.

In Canada, regulations for the armed forces allow Sikhs to keep their turbans and beards, and even determine what colors the different military branches can wear. The Royal Canadian Mounted Police allows turbans as well.

The British Army allows Sikhs to generally keep their articles of faith. For Sikhs who serve as civilian police officers, The British Police Sikh Association is pushing for development of bulletproof turbans. That would allow Sikhs to be part of firearms units, since safety helmets don't fit over them.

Sikhs have a long history with the U.S. military, serving in World Wars I and II, the Korean and Vietnam wars, and in the Persian Gulf.

One of them is Army Col. Gopal Khalsa, who is retiring in November after more than three decades in uniform, all of those with a turban and beard.

His distinctive appearance has required some conversation and explanation at times, but it's never been a problem for him, or gotten in the way of carrying out his duties or wearing his military equipment.

"Of course there's a lot of looks, but once people get to know you and you're doing the job, that falls by the wayside," Khalsa said.

He thought a rule change would be a good idea, saying the presence of Sikh soldiers would be an asset in places where the United States is currently carrying out military operations, like Afghanistan.

"The Army would be gaining successful, useful soldiers," he said.

Kalsi hopes he can be one of those soldiers, and serve his country as generations of his family have done.

"That's what we connect with, that's part of our heritage," he said. "It links us to our past and our present and hopefully the future."

Comments

Why don,t they make a

Why don,t they make a seperate sikh regiment?It could really help american cause.American army now in all over the world.Send the sikh regiment overseas.e.g war in afghanistan would have been long over,had there been sikh solidiers.Because of their appearance,sikhs,even small in number,appear to be big and if they are armed,lot of times enemies don,t even dare to combat. Let the us army officials read this along with comments from other Army officials for last 150 years. http://sikhquotes.org/128.html Sikhs are very brave. (Maj. Gen. Mukesh Khan Pakistan Army, author of book "Crisis of Leadership") “The major reason for our defeat are Sikhs. We are simply unable to do anything before them despite our best efforts. They are very daring people and are fond of martyrdom. They fight courageously and are capable of defeating an army much bigger than them.” On 3rd December 1971 we fiercely and vigorously attacked the Indian army with infantry brigade near Hussainiwala border. This brigade included Pakistan army’s Punjab regiment together with the Baloch regiment. Within minutes we pushed the Indian army quite far back. Their defense posts fell under our control. The Indian army was retreating back very fast and the Pakistani army was going forward with great speed. Our army reached near Kausre-Hind post (Kasure). There was small segment of Indian army appointed to defend that post and their soldiers belonged to the Sikh Regiment. A few number of the Sikh Regiment stopped our way forward like an iron wall. They greeted us with the ovation (Slogan) of ‘Bolé-so-Nihal’ and attacked us like bloodthirsty, hungry lions and hawks. All these soldiers were Sikhs. There was even a dreadful hand-to-hand battle. The sky filled with roars of ‘Yaa Ali and Sat Sri Akal’. Even in this hand-to-hand fighting the Sikhs fought so bravely that all our desires, aspirations and dreams were shattered. In this war Lt. Col. Gulab Hussain was killed. With him Maj. Mohammed Zaeef and Capt. Arif Alim also died. It was difficult to count the number of soldiers who got killed. We were astonished to see the courage of those, handful of Sikh soldiers. When we seized the possession of the three-story defense post of concrete, the Sikh soldiers went onto the roof and kept on persistently opposing us. The whole night they kept on showering fires on us and continued shouting the loud ovation of ‘Sat Sri Akal’. These Sikh soldiers kept on the encounter till next day. Next day the Pakistani tanks surrounded this post and bombed it with guns. Those, handful of Sikhs got martyred in this encounter while resisting us, but other Sikh soldiers then destroyed our tanks with the help of their artillery. Fighting with great bravery they kept on marching forward and thus our army lost its foothold. Alas! A handful of Sikhs converted our great victory into big defeat and shattered our confidence and courage. The same thing happened with us in Dhaka, Bangladesh. In the battle of Jassur, the Singhs opposed the Pakistan army so fiercely that our backbone and our foothold were lost. This became the main important reason of our defeat; and Sikhs’ strength, safety and honour of the country, became the sole cause of their victory.

VIN GAHAK GUN VAICHIEA' TAU GUN SAHGO JAE'

sikhs must stand up to their values. again don't attacked anyboy show our power.sit back and watch.\ time is coming when sikh will HAVE armies not just regiment. take guindance from SGGS.GURU SAHAE'

NANAK ANDHA HOEKE RATNA PARKHAN JAE,RATNA SAAR NA JANHI AAVE' AA

WHY professional sikhs putting themselves on sale again and again, become indepedent ,work hard and set up your own empire that what 'khalsa' means. establish your own hospitals, first help other sikhs then join you and help the humanity..these western people are blind they don't know the value of 'rattana'. blind man can't appraise jewel and pearls , pay attentention to GURBANI.follow jews model of buisness ,now they control big sector of american economy,they were treated like sikh 50 years ago, still not liked much but control fate of vital sectors of service and economy.wake up take guidance from JAGT JOT SHRI GURU GRANTH SAHIB JI then these armies will be under your command. GURU RAKHA.

Remember 1984 planned attack on sikhs by Hindus

"Our greatest glory is not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall."

Keep on Fighting we will win.

Why again and again Turban, Beard, Kirpan issue in USA, UK, France is raised . Highly intolerant, illiterate countries of world is USA , UK and France . Till date there are many court cases we have won in this matter but they dont understand or dont want to understand it in toto.--------May be it is our fault since we are agnorant of Gurbani and unknowlingly we support fake Sikh Harbhajan Singh (Yogi) Hindu and his Yoga promoter GANG under SIKH image. Yogi and Yoga was rejected by Gurus read Guru Granth Saheb Ji. We request through Sikhnet forum to Harbhajan Singh Yogi Gang to stop Sikh image for promoting Yoga (We are not slandering any Sant we are Bringing True face of this Hindu sect . One fine day you Sikhs staying abroad for earning DOLLARS/Pounds may say dont slander Gurmit Rahim Singh Height of ignorance. How you can afford to forget your Guru Teachings). In India there are millions of Yoga Teacher's Ramdev baba is also teaching Yoga we dont have any problem with him since he don't have any hidden agenda against Sikhs. If our Sikh Brother's are wearing Bangle we protest to run your YOGAISM/HINDUISM show under Sikh image in presence of Guru Granth Saheb ji.

karm kaur ji

yes i agree yoga phiosophy was first of all rejected by guru nanak dev ji. yogism died soon in india. had it been simple way of excercise, to keep yourself healthy then there is no issue. but its another philosophy.karm kaur ji, please elaborate with examples from gurbani. we have our own philosophy donot mix some other philosophy branding it your own.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.