News

Sikh Arrested and Turban Snatched by State Marshals in Connecticut Courthouse.

News Source: www.punjabnewsline.com

Wednesday, 02 July 2008 - STAMFORD, CT: Forty-seven year old truck driver Sachdev Singh entered the State of Connecticut Superior Court on June 18, 2008, seeking to contest a traffic violation when he was arrested for wearing a kirpan, a blade that is a Sikh article of faith, and his turban was forcibly removed from his head.

The incident occurred soon after Sachdev Singh entered the courthouse as he was passing through security, handled by the Connecticut Judicial State Marshals. Sachdev Singh wore his approximately five-inch long kirpan under his clothing, as many Sikhs do, and stated to security officers on three different occasions before entering the metal detector that he had "a religious symbol under my clothes."

The marshals did not inquire as to the religious symbol, expressed that it was fine to enter, only informing him that he had to deposit his cellphone and camera with one of the marshals. When Sachdev Singh passed under the metal detectors, he was promptly arrested and both his kirpan and his turban were stripped away from him forcibly.

The event in question occurred when Sachdev Singh notified a marshal prior to entering the metal detector at the courthouse of the presence of "a religious symbol" under his clothing. Assured that all would be well and that he should turn his camera and cell phone, which are not allowed, over to another marshal before going through the metal detector, he did just that, giving the cell phone and camera to one marshal and stating again that he carried a "religious symbol" under his clothes, who made no objection or inquiry. Approaching the metal detectors once more, Sachdev Singh again declared that he carried a "religious symbol" under his clothing. The marshals, at this juncture, waved Sachdev Singh through the detectors, and as he passed, the detectors beeped. Sachdev Singh, following directions, did as the marshals asked and displayed his kirpan, resulting in an marshal holding his arm immediately. Sachdev Singh politely requested that the marshal let go of his arm and stated to the marshals that he had declared the presence of "a religious symbol under my clothes" several times to three different state marshals and was assured that he only was required to leave his cellphone and camera behind. At no point did any official question what the article of faith was or ask him to display it. State marshals then handcuffed Sachdev Singh as they asked him whether he had anything in his turban, to which he responded that he did not. Despite Sachdev Singh's statement, a few minutes later after being escorted to a table where all his possessions had been placed, a marshal came up behind Sachdev Singh and tore off his turban without asking his permission to remove it, then placing it on the table.

After approximately an hour of questioning, Sachdev Singh's handcuffs were removed, he was allowed to retie his turban, and then was placed under arrest for "carrying a dangerous weapon." Sachdev Singh was taken to jail where he was fingerprinted and his turban was once again forcibly removed. Currently, Sachdev Singh is being charged with a possession of a dangerous weapon, which is punishable by up to $500 in fines, up to 3 years in prison, or both. Under this charge, if the edge portion of the blade exceeds 4 inches in length, it is considered "a dangerous weapon." However, it is to be noted that the five-inch kirpan he was carrying at the time was so dull that the "edge" could be rubbed along one's hand without causing any harm. He was released from jail once he posted bail. "It was a great shock that state marshals handling security of a court of law would treat me in this manner," commented Sachdev Singh. "I am concerned this incident will adversely affect my citizenship status, as I am applying for naturalization, and I am upset that my rights were so unlawfully cast aside in a courthouse, of all places," he added.

When UNITED SIKHS was called by the victim, UNITED SIKHS immediately attempted to contact Judicial Marshal's Chief Victor Corley who handles security at the courthouse where the incident occurred, and also called State Attorney David Cohen of the Prosecutor's Office, both of whom were unavailable.

"According to Connecticut State statute Sec. 53-206, which Sachdev Singh is charged with violating, one cannot carry 'any knife the edged portion of the blade of which is four inches or over in length,' " remarked Jaspreet Singh, Staff Attorney for UNITED SIKHS. "In this case, seeing as the blade was completely dull to the point of being able to rub one's hand over it without injury, it should not be considered a 'dangerous weapon'. Furthermore, prior case precedent in multiple states show that the kirpan to be treated only as an article of faith and should never be classified as a dangerous weapon."

UNITED SIKHS is working actively to have the charges levied against Sachdev Singh dismissed, and is exploring various civil remedies to ensure that a training program about Sikhs for the Connecticut State Marshals is put into place to prevent any future recurrence of mistreatment of a Sikh, including his or her turban.
 

travelling within India

pawandeep84's picture
i have traveled twice by plane within in India. passing from the security check they ask to see my kirpan, i show them, it is around 6inch, they allowed me without any problem in plane (with kirpan). while going for international flights from India it is not allowed (i think) < ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ ਜੀ ਕਾ ਖਾਲਸਾ, ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ ਜੀ ਕੀ ਫਤਿਹ

Dear All Gurmukh Pyare, This

Dear All Gurmukh Pyare, This is a very saddening event. I feel respect for Singh Sahib who had to go through all this> May Waheguru bless him with more courage to heal through this process. I dont wear a kirpan, but I can add, we can still carry the one which is 3.75 inches long and is not categorised as a sharp and dangerous weapon. I travel alot and never have faced a ban on carrying a 'baaj' , 'saliyee' or the so called 'Killi' on to a plane in the US, but have faced ban on carrying it on a plane in India ! If you were to modify kirpan as per the regulations, we can smartly do it without modifying the faith. This doesn't result in any kind of hinderence to the adherence of the 5 K's. Is this justified?

Kirpans and Courthouses

WAHEGURU JI KA KHALSA, WAHEGURU JI KI FATEH Firs and foremost, never blame the victim. Sachdev Singh is a victim of stupid and unprofessional behavior, and the Marshals may be at risk of a bias attack if they uttered a single word in prejudicial context (which is not quote in the body of the press release). Mr. Singh repeatedly declares that he had a religious symbol under his shirt. The Marshals were stupid enough not to inquire further aka. can we see it. He told the repeatedly. Secondly, rough handling of a person is not conduct becoming any law enforcement official...remember that their job is to SERVE and protect, NOT abuse and oppress. They shoed no sensitivity towards Mr. Singh's religious sentiments. Rather, instead of addressing the "threat" of the Kirpan, they most sacrilegiously ripped off Sachdev Singh's turban. Despite the fact that they asked Mr. Singh whether there was anything under his turban, they failed to perform a hand metal "wand" detector test to confirm. Rather they desecrated Mr. Singh's person by ripping off his turban. Any human being, be they the most moronic and ignorant, would be able to conclude that such an act is a most vile and sub-human act to perpetrate on another, knowing that is of great religious sentiment. I would hope that not only is Mr. Singh's record expunged on the state's budget, but that UNITED SIKHS pursues charges and sanctions against the Marshals in this case. The unwritten citizen law of the U.S. is that unless you can hurt the perpetrators and set an example (aka. sanctions), the cycle of stupidity will continue. Every religious group in the U.S. and generally worldwide has had to fight for its religious rights. The Sikhs are no different. So it is not our job as Sikhs to bend over and let the "government" walk over us. We all seem to forget that the government is here to serve us, not the other way around. The U.S. Constitution has secured the freedom of religion and the right to bear arms, which was recently expanded and solifidied by the U.S. Supreme Court. It is our duty to remind the justice system and the administration just exactly what the forefathers of the U.S. wrote as the ideals...ideals they forget to apply to fellow Americans. A Sikh's job is to stand up for everyone's rights, including his/her own. So rather than laying down and surrendering to the government, stand up and defend your rights...this is the duty of not only a Sikh, but also an American.

I wear my kirpan to all the courts in the UK

Sorry to see such heated and shallow arguments about the Guru's gift for the Sikh. Just for information, I live in the UK and always wear my Kirpan when visiting public buildings. When visiting Courts, sometimes the scanner picks it up the kirpan and I tell the guard that, "I am wearing a kirpan which is a Sikh religious symbol". A couple of times I have had to show the kirpan to the guard so they can be certain that it is a kirpan and not a gun! So far, I have never been denied access to a Court or government building in the UK. When visiting the Passport office near Victoria, I was asked to deposit the kirpan in a plastic bag, leave it with the guards and to collect it on exit - which was fine. So if you live in the UK, you should not have any worries. My kirpan is about 6" in length in total with the bluntish blade of about 3.5" and is worn under the shirt. The solution is to educate the authorities and not to get angry. Once the local community are aware, this problem will subside. Regards, HS

sad day

jdeeps23's picture
man that really really sucks, i can't believe the part where that stupid marshall came up behind Sachdev Singh and took of his turban without telling him. I dont know about you but i would of gotten really pissed off. I mean come on, the dastaar is our saroop, our life. What would you have done in that situation? I swear the government needs to pass a federal law to allow sikhs to wear a kirpan period.......I've already gone through this type of stuff, my first case i was charged for carrying a deadly weapon but that was dismissed and than the second time i was arrested and taken to jail where i was later bailed out. I was wearing two kirpans, the one that i wore on the outside was a 4 inch kirpan with a gathra and cover and the second kirpan which i wore all the time under my shirt didn't have a gathra and cover, it was attatched to a thick "thaga" and the blade itself was like 2 inches and was so dull that i could rub it against my arm and it wouldn't have caused in harm. The kirpan under my shirt was on me all the time , i basically used it for showering purpose so that i wouldn't ruin the one i wore on the outside. I was charged not for the 4 inch kirpan that i wore outside but the one that i wore under my shirt because it didn't have a cover and so the court saw it as something that was ready for use, even though it was dull. Another thing i would like to point out, i remeber after my first kirpan case was dismissed, i had to come back to the court to pay for the expungedment charges, before i went through security I showed the shariff that i have a religious dagger and a court paper signed by the judge allowing me to recieve my kirpan back which they took during the incident. So the sheriff was kind enough to go and talk to the judge before allowing me to walk inside the court with my kirpan which i was wearing on the outside. With guru ji's blessing, the sheriff said it was okay for me to enter the court with my kirpan. After all that and so much depression i now wear a very small kirpan probably total lenghtt 1 inch. I wear it as a necklace like some amrit dhari grandmas do. I'm not only imbarrased but very sad that i have to wear such a small kirpan. I really wish i could wear a bigger kirpan openly, but i have a feeling that probably won't happen here in america for a very very long time. And especially after 9/11, forget it. I'm sorry if i have said anything wrong , i just wish there was a solution instead having to stay in fear hoping that i dont' wind up in jail the third time and paying the thousands and thousands dollar fines. If the sangat or anybody have any questions about my case or in general, please feel free to contact me, jdeeps23@hotmail.com. WJKK,WJKF

Good Sardar saab..!! for

Good Sardar saab..!! for sharing your experience..!!

First off, I would not wear

First off, I would not wear a kirpan to a courthouse. Second, I would show it to them and not just say that I have a religious symbol under my clothes. They probably thought he had a "cross" under his clothes. Even if he wore his kirpan he should've checked it in with cellphone ............... Just my 2 cents.

First off,

First off, I wonder if you are actually a Gursikh? If you were then you would realize that the panj kakkars are a part of your physical body once given by Guru ji, obviously your motto is 'rather than stand up for your rights and beleifs, then leave them at home so you dont get inconvenianced'. (hey, if they ban the wearing of distars, then we should just wear them at home, and got out with our hair open !!?). If your only argument is the one of going on an aeroplane, then that is very sad.... It is with a heavy heart a true Sikh of the Guru leaves his Kakkars at home, especially when travel is a must. It is not a game or a toy that you wear and leave at home when it does not suit your conveniance. This situation has put the highlight on Sikhs entering court, in that state, the marshalls will now also have knowledge of Sikh faith. But, then again maybe it is correct, to rip off a Sikhs distar twice, just because you beleive he made a mistake.. or then again maybe you over value your opinion at 2 cents... (I dont need to be sorry for my opinion).

"I would not wear a kirpan

"I would not wear a kirpan to a courthouse". "Even if he wore his kirpan he should've checked it in with cellphone" - Are you sure what is amrit??? Your knowledge of Sikhism is not worth of even 2 cents..!! I am sorry if my words are harsh..!!!

You don't have to be sorry.

You don't have to be sorry. You are just sharing your opinion and you may be correct that my knowledge is not even worth 2 cents. I am just curious what did you do with your Kirpan last time when you took a flight?

The kirpan is not someting

The kirpan is not someting to be worn whenever you want or to be put away if it might offend someone. If the court security had any understanding of this they would not have acted the way they did. I hope they are willing to learn about what the kirpan is. For me it is part of the core of my being along with the 5 K's.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Email Lists

SikhNet.com Updates Daily Sikh News Daily Hukamnama Unsubscribe