Sikh wisdom

May 18th, 2009 by Miroslav Volf Source: www.christiancentury.org

One of the most recognizable pieces of religious architecture in the world is the Golden Temple in Amritsar, India, the most significant place of worship of the Sikhs. The upper part of this ornate rectangular marble structure is covered in gold. I saw the gleaming temple early in the morning, before sunrise, when it was bathed in soft artificial light. It stood immovable as a huge gilded rock, its reflected image dancing gently on the surface of the surrounding pool.

I was in Amritsar as a Christian consultant for a meeting of the Elijah Board of World Religious Leaders, organized by my friend Rabbi Alon Goshen-Gottstein. I had written a position paper to serve as a basis for discussions that would include the Dalai Lama and the chief rabbi of Jerusalem. Six writers of position papers representing different world religions had discussed their drafts with one another and with a larger interfaith group of scholars. It was a fascinating exercise. As I was writing, I was aided by wisdom from other faith traditions. What I presented as genuinely my own was in part received from others.

I grew up solidly Protestant in an overwhelmingly Catholic and Orthodox environment controlled by aggressively secular communists. Unlike the communists, those in our Protestant tribe nurtured a sense of the holy. But we differed from the Catholics and the Orthodox in that for us holiness was not to be located in time and space. The eternal and omnipresent God was holy; people could be holy if they made themselves available for God; times and places were not holy. We did not follow a liturgical calendar closely, and we met for worship in remodeled rooms of an ordinary house on an ordinary street. As a child of a pastor, I lived in that house; the neighbor kids and I played soccer in its yard and marbles on the patch of dirt in front of it. As examples of sacred architecture, the places where I experienced God—in restless rebellion and not just in sweet surrender—were the polar opposites of the Golden Temple.

At the temple I walked barefoot and with covered head around the holy pool in which people took ritual baths. I observed the people quietly streaming to the temple and walking by the place where Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji is kept, the holy book which ultimately makes the place holy. But I didn't feel spiritually pulled in. I was a sympathetic observer, learning, questioning, puzzling over things, appreciating. I remained an outsider, not a participant.

Yet I took with me something unforgettable, a nugget of enacted religious wisdom that I cherish more than I would a piece of that temple's gold.

The next day, as I walked one more time within the temple complex, I wanted to buy a souvenir for my two boys. Then it dawned on me: I hadn't seen a vendor or a shop anywhere on the temple premises. "Thousands of religious tourists mill around here every day," I thought. "There must be a place to buy souvenirs!" But there wasn't.

You had to leave the temple complex and step onto the profane ground of surrounding streets to satisfy your tourist appetite. There peddlers were as busy as anywhere else in the world, and I found what I was looking for—a small kirpan, a ritual sword that all baptized Sikh wear. But not on the holy site—there the only commercial transaction that took place was the purchase of a "ticket" to walk across the bridge to the temple in the middle of the lake. The ticket was a bowl of porridge, the size of which depended on how much you paid. You could eat some of it, but you were expected to put at least a portion of it into large bowls. When the bowls were filled, they were carried off to feed the poor.

The contrast between the Golden Temple and other religious sites I've seen could not be greater. Everywhere else, greedy people—often religious leaders with business managers—were trying to cash in on the devotion of visitors. Here that devotion was channeled into feeding the hungry. I was reminded of the story of Jesus' cleansing of the temple, recorded in all four Gospels. "And he entered the temple and began to drive out those who were selling and those who were buying in the temple. . . . 'Is it not written,' he said, '"My house shall be called a house of prayer for all the nations"? But you have made it a den of robbers.'" The Gospels consistently tie Jesus' death to the cleansing of the temple. Mark's account continues, "And when the chief priests and the scribes heard it, they kept looking for a way to kill him."

I came away from the Golden Temple with a nugget of wisdom—houses of worship should not be sites of commercial activity, but places of gift giving to the needy, just as faith itself is not to be bought and sold but freely given. That Sikh wisdom turned out to be buried treasure of my own faith.
    
Miroslav Volf, a Century editor at large, teaches at Yale Divinity School.

Comments

We fail to promote Sikhism

There is no doubt there is a huge contrast not only between the Harmandar Sahib (Golden temple) and other Gurdwaras but also between various Gurdwaras in the same city, for example, the historic Gurdwaras in Delhi. I have found the prabandhaks at Sees Ganj Gurdwara (Chandni Chowk) are far more helpful than the ones at Bangla Sahib. I few months ago I had to meet an ex-jathedar at Bangla Sahib Gurdwara. He asked me to wait for him at the visitor’s office. The gentleman in charge of this office was arrogant, egoistic, disinterested and a gossip-monger. He, I later found out, was designated to give guided tours to visitors, in particular non-Sikhs. This gentleman was in no way qualified for this job and in my opinion could not sell a bag of potatoes at a market place leave alone promote spiritual values of Sikhism. I agree with KJ Singh that Sikhnet appears to post ‘sensation-making’ material rather than those which promote core Sikh values. Perhaps they are falling prey to the ‘ratings’ disease which inflicts TV companies –I sincerely hope not but many Sikhs have registered on this site simply to respond to anti-Sikh propaganda in which some individuals are engaged. You only have to go to the archives to see what I mean. Sensation creating articles attract individuals of all kinds, but in particular, the radical types. Some decent Sikhs are afraid of posting there views for reasons of being branded one way or the other – if they are too pro-Sikh they are accused as being fanatics by individuals subscribing to Brahmanical teachings and if they post secular views then they are accused of being lesser-Sikhs or not at all. The diversification of opinion within the Sikh fraternity is getting wider by the day. So where do we go from here? Sikhism, I am convinced, has a lot to offer in this century and centuries to come. The concepts of self-sacrifice, grahsathi jeevan and spirituality, langar, miri piri, sant sipahi and many others are unique and are the envy of our faiths. However, we are our own worst enemies as we are totally inept at promoting these concepts and values. The SGPC is really an impotent body, just as good (or as bad) as the individuals who run it. Pressure must be brought to bear upon it by all forward thinking Sikhs and in particular, by the no—resident Sikhs as they have the financial and objectivity clout by forming a strong lobby. It is wrong expecting one person to do it all and this makes me wary of the wary of the critics of PM Manmohan Singh. Although I do agree he could have done more for the Sikhs (and perhaps he will now that his position is stronger) but to place all the woes and sufferings of Sikhs at his door step is wrong. If Sikhs want him to do more then they must lobby and create a situation where the PM has no choice and can force the issues on the Government. Without our help he cannot do much as his cabinet will just turn around and say “why is he creating a fuss when the Sikhs are quite”.

arsi ji

well said arshi ji. but selling of karah prashad at many gurudwaras,selling of saropa with patasa inside snactum-sactorum of darbar sahib don`t you think are not according to gurmat. it was me who several time questioned my parents whats need of selling karah prashad at gurudwaras. sikhism can give only when we practice sikhism in a way that our mentors has tought us. i made a small but careful study of many deras, radha-soami sects etc why they are able to make impact on masses. they all steal techings from guru sahib, and brand it as their own. though many sucessful deras are anti-sikh but their way of handling masses, extension education (regarding teaching of their group) is magnificient. we cant imitate them but atleast can organise things and can make things more disciplined.

Procedural issues and exploitation of Sikhism

‘stand for truth’ you have raised interesting issues. When you donate at historical Gurdwaras you can do so in several ways, for example: (1) Building fund (2) Langar (3) Ardaas (4) Karah prashad di deg. I think this is one way of supporting our institutions. How you do it is your choice. If you choose option (4) then this is only relevant where you go as a group or family and you want to offer Ardas and at the same time offer sacramental blessing in the form of parshad to your family and friends present or carry some home. That is why you get a portion depending upon your donation, which is dictated by the size of your group. This, some Sikhs find, is an easy way of invoking Guru’s blessings rather than hold a private religious ceremony at home or at a local Gurdwara. I agree with you that WITH MOST PEOPLE THIS HAS BECOME A RITUAL. I, many years ago, went with my uncle to Gurdwara Sis Ganj and not knowing the system donated a big sum for prashad. In return I got a siropau and a huge portion of parshad. It was too much for the two of us, so I stood in front of the Gurdwara and distributed, very respectfully, to the sangat outside who gladly received it. Since then if I want to make donation I dedicate it to the langar or the building fund or some other suitable requirement of the Gurdwara. HOWEVER, THESE ARE PROCEDURAL AND INTERNAL ISSUES which do not endanger our survival and can be resolved relatively easily. But your other concern is much more serious. THE FACT THAT DERAS AND VARIANT SHAKHAS OF QUASI-SIKH IDEOLOGY ARE USING GURBANI TO PROMOTE OWN AGENDA POSE A SERIOUS THREAT TO MAINSTREAM SIKHISM. Such institutes (like the one you quoted) are very well organised who, in particular, target NRIs and wealthy Sikhs. These are extremely smart people who have a pre-planned agenda and know what they are doing. They are in it for themselves. We must not imitate them but try and examine our own shortcomings and campaign for change in a disciplined manner, for example, talk to Jathedars at historical places, question their procedures if you are not sure of the underlying reasons behind a particular custom. They may have a logical explanation but you must show why they are wrong and if you are convinced they are wrong then lobby for support. Above all we must educate ourselves on the true Sikh tenets and ethics. Good wishes and keep on track.

Mr. Miroslav Volf's visit to Harimandir Sahab

I endorese to the views expressed by Mr. Gill. When will sikh religious leader will wake up? What Mr. Gill has expressed should be there long before. When a foreigner visits Golden Temple, a learned guide with thorough knowledge of sikh ideology, what does Langar, Sewa and Simaran stand for. There is a perfect synchronisation and balance in these three principals. Though Mr. Miroslav Volf has left Golden Temple with a positive note, however, his views on contrast between the Golden Temple and other religious sites would have been much greater had someone with deep sikhism philosophy explained him the difference between other relious sites and Golden temple. I would like to request to SGPC to take note of this tour and in future a learned Gyaniji with perfect english knowledge should be detailed to explain everything about sikhism.

Sikh Wisdom

Wish someone was with Mirslav Volf to explain the importance of "LANGAR" and GURBANI. We lack in people who have the correct knowledge of Sikh History and especially GURBANI. If we take more care of such visitors from different faiths who come to Haminder Sahib to learn about Sikhism and rather than them going away with wrong impression of people believing in "Rituals". THE TRUE MESSAGE OF GURU SAHIBS NEEDS TO BE EXPLAINED I am requesting the SGPC to have people available at hand to escort likes of Mirslav Volf such that a proper conducted tour with correct explanation of "LANGAR", "SEVA" "GURU GRANTH SAHIB" and the importance of "KIRTAN" . This will promote correct message to the World at large.

yes brother

its not only leader but common sikh also must come out of hibernation.formal education about sikh religion i think should be given to all sikhs right from very early age. if masses change leaders are compelled to change. our sevadars should also be tought, at least how to talk with sangat, most of the time they are rude. incidents like denying entry of australian couple inside darbar sahib ( as lady was wearing medically prescribed bandages). print media hyped it at least in india. tried to to show sikhism in bad light.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.