The Resurgence of the Sikh Religion - Part I

January 12th, 2009 Source: sikhsangat.org
Op-Ed from Sikhsangat.org

The decline of Sikhism began under the regime of Maharaja Ranjit Singh who could neither understand the philosophy enunciated by Guru Gobind Singh nor did he follow the concept of Miri Piri defined by Guru Hargobind. Instead, he followed the imperial life style of the Mughal emperors and indulged in extravagance and loose morality. In this way he neglected the Sikh tenets and allowed evils and vices to be crept in the religion. Instead of paying obeisance to Harimandir Sahib and bathing in the Sarovar regularly he paid visits to Haridwar and bathed in the Ganga river. When he died some of his wives Came “Satis” which rite was repugnant to Sikh religion.

When the British conquered and annexed Punjab in 1849 they were aware of the power and glory of the Sikhs. They also new that Sikh power emerges from the Gurdwaras. Therefore they conceived a sinister plan to scuttle Sikhism by taking control of these institutions of religious power through their agents. In pursuit of their aim they installed Hindu Mahants as managers of historic and important Gurdwaras. For instance Mahant Narain Das and Mahant Sadhu Ram, both anti Sikh elements, were respectively made in-charge of Gurdwara Nankana Sahib and Harimandir Sahib. The fanatic and corrupt Hindu Mahants installed idols in the Gurdwaras and introduced Hindu rites and rituals which practices were denounced and renounced by the Sikh Gurus. In this way the Mahants again brought Sikh religion under the evil influence of Hinduism and muddled it greatly.

At the same time Daya Nand Sarswati, founder of Arya samaj, aggressively launched a campaign against Sikh religion. He criticised Guru Nanak Dev ji and Guru Gobind Singh and denounced Guru Granth Sahib. His tirade against Sikhism was effectively checked by the devout Sikhs who formed Singh Sabhas, Shiromani Akali Dal, and Chief Khalsa Diwan. These institutions countered the ill-designed campaign launched by the Arya S’amajis. These Sikh organizations, with a view to regaining the control of the historic Gurdwaras, launched a vigorous struggle. They also founded Gurdwara Prabandhak Committee for the management of historic Gurdwaras. The British rulers were forced to give legal sanctity to the Shiromani Gurdwara Prabandhak Committee and for that purpose they passed the Gurdwara Act in 1925 and recognised the Shiromani Gurdwara Prabandhak Committee as the sole authority to control and manage the historic Gurdwaras in the united Punjab. Thus an ill-conceived designs of the Hindus with collaboration of the British to assimilate Sikhism in Hinduism was successfully foiled. The control of historic Gurdwaras, including Nankana Sahib and Sanctum sanctorum, Harimandir Sahih, was taken over from the corrupt and immoral Mahants at heavy loss of lives of the devout Sikhs.

When the British granted freedom in 1947 they gave Pakistan to Muslims and gifted the rest of India to the Hindus. The Sikhs were left in the lurch because of deceit by Mohan Das Karam Chand Gandhi, Jawahar Lal Nehru and other Hindu leaders. Master Tara Singh could be equally blamed for this act of deceit. These Hindu leaders promised the Sikh leaders that after attaining freedom the Sikhs would be assigned a specific area in the north west India where they could feel a glow of freedom and advocate their religion and culture. When the deceptive Hindus got freedom in 1947 and consolidated their power they conveniently forgot the promises made to the Sikhs. Not only that they were not given the promised land but they were constitutionally made a part and parcel of Hinduism which the Sikh Gurus had denounced and renounced more than four and half centuries ago. Article 25 (2) was incorporated in the Constitution of India which defines the Sikhs as Hindus. This was a clever move of the Hindus to assimilate Sikhism by dubious means.

When the Indian government decided to reorganise states on linguistic basis and census was held in 1951 the Hindus living in Punjab recorded Hindi as their mother tongue though they spoke pure Punjabi at homes and in conversation with others. This was another attempt on their part to deprive the Sikhs of their Constitutional and fundamental right to claim a Punjabi speaking state. Such Hindus who can betray their mother tongue can also be supposed to betray their mother land for their selfish and vested interests. Thus the fanatic Hindus by their deliberate acts have sowed the seeds of blatant communalism and then they blather to blame others for its emergence.

In 1956 all Hindu dominated states were reorganized on language basis but Punjab under the preconceived scheme was declared as a bilingual state. The Sikhs felt further betrayed. To get justice from the communal forces, the Sikhs launched a Morcha for formation of a Punjabi speaking state. The communal Hindus of united Punjab started a counter agitation opposing the creation of Punjabi speaking state. This counter agitation was started at the behest of the Indian Government which was overwhelmingly dominated by the Hindus. Nevertheless after a protracted struggle carried out by the Akali Dal for a decade and sacrificing costly lives, they achieved their partial aim in the form of a truncated Punjab on 1st November, 1966 minus Haryana and Chandigarh, the capital of the state. Not only this a large area of Punjab including Shimla, Dalhousie, Kulu Manali, Lahaul Spiti and Dharmshala were merged with Himachal Pradesh. Besides this gross injustice the Indian Government retained with it the control of Bhakra Management Board and river waters distribution.

The Shiromani Akali Dal again launched a Morcha demanding inter-alia restoration of Punjabi speaking areas given to Himachal Pradesh and Haryana, Union Territory of Chandigarh, control over river waters and enactment of All India Gurdwara Act, with a view to encompassing the control of Nander Sahib, Patna Sahib and other historic Gurdwaras situated in other states, But the Indian Government was not to yield so easily. When the Morcha reached its climax Indira Gandhi, the Prime Minister, announced an award in 1970 proposing to transfer Chandigarh to Punjab provided Fazilka and Abohar, which are Punjabi speaking areas, but Hindu majority areas are given to Haryana in lieu of Chandigarh. This was out and out a communal approach. When the Sikhs were consistently discriminated and betrayed by the Indian government, the Akali Dal was forced to recast their demands. In pursuit of this the Akali Dal drafted a resolution and passed it at Anandpur Sahib in October 1973. This resolution is known as Anandpur Sahib Resolution. The main features of this Resolution are: the Union government should keep four portfolios viz; Defence, Foreign Affairs, Currency and Communication, with it and rest of the powers should vest in the states so that a true federal system of government is given a practical shape. It also says that the people should be permitted to keep arms ranging from shot gun to carbine of 30 calibre subject to the condition that the person should not be a convict and that he/she shall get the arms registered with the authorities. This Resolution in a modified form was passed in the annual conference of Akali Dal held at Ludhiana in October, 1978.

Comments

Maharaja never wore Santa's gown :)

Whosoever's pic is this, I'm very sure that Maharaja Ranjit Singh(MRS) never wore Santa clause's gown which the man in this pic is wearing :) Of course! this article is a critique for the Maharaja and his administration but author forgot to mention the exact no. of wives who committed sati with MRS, it was an astounding fiugre of 400 (approx.) + 7 daasis/ maids whom he also married.... MRS was more of a secular/nationalist ruler than a true gursikh/ khalsa which can be exemplified from the fact that besides his offering of gold at Sri Harimandar Sahib, he gave away 16 quintals (about 1600 kg/ 3600 lbs) of gold for Hindu temples in total (which was stolen by wicked brahmin priests later on) [Source: The Sikhs in History, By Sangat Singh ji].. Another aspect that author has highlighted about the partition of Punjab seems partial to Sikhs but it was in favour of Muslims because there were two states with Muslim-majority prior to the Indian independence i.e Bengal and Punjab... Bengal was partitioned into East and west Bengal, West Bengal in India and E. Bengal became as East Pakistan which Pakistanis lost in a war with India and then it became an independent country called Banglaesh.... As far as Punjab's scenerio ws concerned the demography was : Muslims: 50%, Hindus: 35%, Sikhs: 13% and others: 2% [Source: The History of Sikhs Vol I, By Khushwant Singh]... Hence the partition of Punjab was inevitable.... Now whatever the History be... we should learn our lessons from it and look into the future with a motive to bring about some positive change globally to lay the foundation stone for "Heaven on earth"!!..... But being lanlocked is definitely is a great concern for the Khalistani visionaries... BTW what's the picture of Sant Jarnail Singh ji Bhindranwale doing here ?? Author ji!! just the pic.... not even a single line about him ?? But it will always be a debate whether he was fortitude-personiifed for his act of standing against the wrath of mighty Indian govt. or the same act was pussilanimity-exemplified for his choice of golden temple complex as the battleground..... Well! nobody is perfect!! and he was also a human ultimately.... All in all, the article though very illustrious and informative lacked some facts and figures and could've been more impressive if it ended up with a positive note recommending solutions for the panth resulting in a WIN-WIN situation between the Sikh community and the rest of the world including the GOI where the latter is too egocentric to accept the equality of sikhs.... May waheguru help us work out the solutions for our panthic problems.

bad maharajah ranjit singh.

was a good ruler fair multicultural and not a xenophobe. he was not blinded by seats and chauder like some commitee members i know globally in sikh temples and institutions.both in ontario ,quebec,england,california and punjab. where is the beef,the truch sacha sauda or shromani dictation? ..................................................................................................... dhallian.,distt.ludhiana,punjab,india. i am confused and in the middle. but a pepsu, liberal ,akali, royalist....................................................................................... drdhaliwal@me.com

Thanks for clarifying the photo

http://www.sikhiwiki.org/index.php/Sher_Ali_Khan above is the link to the disputed photo in question and proof that it is not Maharaja Ranjit Singh, but is Sher Ali Khan from Afghanistan. After initially seeing the photograph I thought it could perhaps be Ranjit Singh, but I could never believe that the larger guy in back could be Hari Singh Nalwa - aside from his hat not looking like a Damalla or a Pagri of any form whatsoever, the guy just definitely doesn't look like a GurSikh. Now, comparing the British officers and Sher Ali Khan to other historic photos of them it is clearly not Ranjit Singh or Hari Singh Nalwa - see the above link. Those able to should do sewa and bring the other photos and information to the attention of the Gurdwara Presidents where this photo is incorrectly on display so that they are politely removed. As for the above article... tone down the anti-hindu sentiment it takes away from your argument and just makes you sound - well anti-hindu. Let the facts speak for themselves, no need to impose personal sentiment (though I know it is difficult). Gur Fateh!!! Gurusevak Singh

get real

one of my friends who did a history major and travelled in india had an interesting theory on the partition of punjab and the sikhs. firstly if the indian are fighting the british for independence why could they not agree amongst themselves regarding the partition and then they could avoid asking the british to decide what happens. secondly the sikhs have always been a minority in punjab and in a democracy vote banks count. the sikhs are spread all over punjab so there voice is not going to be heard. there is a theory that after partition the british confined the migration of sikhs to certain districts so that they would for the first time form a majority in punjab.

Forgotten History!!! Sad Sad Sad

It is true that during Maharaja Ranjit Singh tenure as a king of united Punjab from 1800 to 1849 ruled 50 years as a Secular state and no discrimination rendered either to Hindus or Muslims . All were being given equal citizenship status irrespective of caste,creed and religion which he followed this legacy from Guru Sahib and even nobody was given death sentence throughout his tenure . But great mistake he did was not recognisedthe TAT Khalsa(true khalsa) i mean Hari Singh Naluwa , Akhali Phula Singh , Shyam Singh Atari and so many others . He always kept faith on Ghulab singh , Lal singh Dogra(who were initially rajput later embraced Sikhism in order to gets benifit from him) who always betrayed him and later renounced the Sikhism when thier goal acheived .Their generation now completely embraced hinduism (Hari Singh who merged kashmir with India in 1947 ) and his son Karan Singh who was foreign minister with Indian Goverment ).Kashmir was also ruled under Maharaja Ranjit singh . and he gave kashmir rule to his pseudo minister . The Gulab singh and Lal singh Dogra betrayed Maharaja by signing accord with Britisher .Hari singh Nalwa the great Gernail of Khalsa Panth was made to fight throuhg out his life on dhra Khebre pass to fight with mighty Turk , Pathan and he so powerfuly reined over them that even phatan wifes used to sleep their weeping sons and please sleep Haria langle . means Hari singh is coming but that TAT Khalsa was so merciful towards those people that he never misused his power and his character was so high that even beautiful pathan women wants to have baby from him but he slept on her womb and said i am your son .Ruling is in the blood of Sikhism.These is the legacy carried by sikhs from their Gurus(SANT SHIPAHI). Hindustan was being invaded and ruled by last 1000 years from Mugal,Turk , Britiser , Dutch , Portugese. It is due to Mard Agmanda Guru Gobind Sing who is only Mard in India continent who not only stopped these attack but reversed it . otherwise the islamic wave which was started from west(Arab) started converting whole Afganistan , Pakistan , jumped from India and went to Indonasia(the biggest Muslim county). That is why the scholars of Muslim Mohmad Iqbal wrote "PHIR OOTHI AKHIR SADHAYA TOHID KI PUNJAB SE HIND KO EK MARDE KAMAL NE JAGAYA KHAB SE" Miya Mir wrote . "BHAT KAYHU MEIN AAB KI NA TAB KI AGAR NA HOTHE GURU GOBIND SINGH TO SUNAT HOTI SAB KI" but great sadness nobody remember the great sacrifices given by Guru Gobind Singh his father , mother , four sons , his beloved sikhs where you can't find and challenge this parallel in world History . and also in India people know the fictious character the Gabar Singh from Shole Film but forgot and does not know the reall hero behind the Gabar Singh the Great Sikh Gernail Hari Singh Naluwa. WaheGuru ji ka Khalsa Waheguru ji ki Fateh . And there is also so much Sadness during partison during 1947 and after that same legacy of betrayal of Lal singh Dogra and Ghulab singh is carried on till date

I have seen that photo. That

I have seen that photo. That photo is of an Amir of afghanistan and not of Maharaja Ranjit singh.

Good

The person you are talking about is not amir of Afganistan; he is Maharaja Ranjit Singh's foreign Minister Fakir Azizuddin, who was a muslim, which clearly tells that there was no discrimination during the Sikh rule. In the picture, Maharaja is sitting while Hari Singh Nalwa is standing along with Azizuddin. Maharaja could be noticed from his one eye, as it alearly appears in the picture.

Paindu ji That photograph

Paindu ji That photograph is from Illustrated news of England dating to around 1846.I have the original in my collections. You also need to know the age of maharaja Ranjit singh at the time of taking photograph along British.He did not have black beard at that time as shown in the photograph. So did Hari Singh Nalwa. Many times we need to use our common sense while making our opinions

If you go to sikhiwiki and

If you go to sikhiwiki and look at the picture, the controversy is regarding the British officer but not Ranjit Singh. Anyways it was nice to meet someone who pays attention to facts in SIkh history.

Could you send me the link

Could you send me the link the link please? If not could you host it somewhere in cyberspace?

Paindu ji I am in transit

Paindu ji I am in transit now.Reaching my home in uS i will try to give you the details about date and page no of Illustrated London news.

Is it Factual?

I would like to ask the author if he/she has seen the original camera photograph of Maharaja Ranjit Singh along with Hari Singh Nalwa and British officers. Upon seeing that photograph one would notice that he is no glamorous man as shown in many paintings. It is true that his wives committed sati but how could you hold a dead man responsible for the actions of his widows? Most of Punjabis today celebrate many "Hindu" festivals such as Rakhri etc. "Instead of paying obeisance to Harimandir Sahib" REALLY? Who did the sewa of Gold at Harimandir Sahib? How could a man like Akal Takht's Jathedar Akali Phoola Singh walk with an unethical leader Ranjit Singh nonetheless go to the battlefield with him? It is true that Sikhs in Punjab have been discriminated by the centre govt. of India but that does not mean that all Hindus hate Sikhs. Let' face it Sikhs hate Sikhs too. Its a fight between haves and have nots. More damage has been done to the kaum by Akali Dal Badal than any other political party. Whether we consider it or not, People living in Punjab consider Badals as Sikhs and voice of Panth. The problem is inside people which comes out in the community at a later time. As guru Sahib said, "Man jeetay Jag jeet."How many those who consider themselves Sikhs actually follow the principles? So I kindly request the author to be more pragmatic and not write articles by merely giving a superficial consideration to facts. Also, please try not to make Sikh vs. Hindu game and vice versa.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.